CO129-557-12 Armstrong and Turner v. Estate Duty Commissioner- appeal to Privy Council 18-5-1936 - 2-10-1936 — Page 6

& Benchells

14/86

Acks (7) No often but to offron

affeal a Livry Commer

From para 2 of (6) it appears that the

the principle

the passage quoted in para 5

BIR do in fact act on

set out in

Of(1) from Dymond

and on

Death Duties.

This

is what the I+K. [oot wanted to know,

and they

are

The UK. practice

apparently desirous of following in the matter, especially if

it is favourable to the appellants.

That being

the case

perhaps

? Burchell's should be asked to referves

تھا

the end of para 5 ft) (of which they receiver a copy) and asked to get in to touch with the appellents London agents to arrange

terms I settlement

07

CyCarstans 21/8/36

this basis.

M. Cowell

This

hist,

Unless I think von short na telpaphe to It.k, the substance of paragraphs 203 of No.6, lape

That Masses Burchells should in instimated to

approach the Appellants Policitors here with a

View to a settlement.

In view of what so said in the last subsparagrape.

is